INPAGE MENU
Abridged structure Full structureOverview
The author guidelines include information about the types of articles received for publication and preparing a manuscript for submission. Other relevant information about the journal's policies and the reviewing process can be found under the about section. The compulsory cover letter forms part of a submission and must be submitted together with all the required forms. All forms need to be completed in English.
Editorials
Editorials are by invitation only and are intended to provide expert comment on relevant topics within the focus and scope of the journal.
|
Submission status |
by invitation only |
|
Word limit |
800 words (excluding the tables, figures, graphs, and references) |
|
Abstract |
none |
|
Main text |
structural headings are not always appropriate, but the editorial should have clear subheadings to provide order to the manuscript |
|
References |
10 or less, adhere to the Harvard referencing style |
|
Tables, figures and graphs |
1 or less, adhere to the Illustrations requirements found in the AOSIS House style guide |
|
Formatting requirements |
apply the guidelines located on the Formatting requirements page and the AOSIS house style guide |
|
Compulsory supplementary file(s) |
the Authorship, disclosure statements, copyright, and license agreement form, and any other relevant form applicable to your submission |
Opinion Papers
Short opinion pieces or personal perspectives (not research papers), personal viewpoints on research, that provide contextual and holistic views. With rare exceptions, these essays are meant to express a personal viewpoint and should have no more than two authors.
|
Submission status |
open |
|
Word limit |
2000 words (excluding the tables, figures, graphs, and references) |
|
Abstract |
maximum: 250 words |
|
Main text |
structural headings are not always appropriate, but the opinion paper should have clear subheadings to provide order to the manuscript |
|
References |
15 or less, adhere to the Harvard referencing style |
|
Tables, figures and graphs |
2 or less, adhere to the Illustrations requirements found in the AOSIS House style guide |
|
Formatting requirements |
apply the guidelines located on the Formatting requirements page and the AOSIS house style guide |
|
Compulsory supplementary file(s) |
the Authorship, disclosure statements, copyright, and license agreement form, Ethical Clearance/Waiver Documentation and any other relevant form applicable to your submission |
|
Ethical clearance/waiver documentation |
not required |
Original Research Articles
An original research article needs to provide an overview of innovative research in a particular field within or related to the focus and scope of the journal, presented according to a clear and well-structured format.
|
Submission status |
open |
|
Word limit |
3000-6000 words (excluding the abstract, tables, figures, graphs, and references) |
|
Abstract |
maximum: 250 words |
|
Main text |
requires structural headings, refer to the full structure
If the study was not human or animal research or the study was determined to be non-human subjects research or exempt, the authors must provide a statement with those details in this section. |
|
References |
60 or less, adhere to the Harvard referencing style |
|
Tables, figures and graphs |
7 or less, adhere to the Illustrations requirements found in the AOSIS House style guide |
|
Formatting requirements |
apply the guidelines located on the Formatting requirements page and the AOSIS house style guide |
|
Compulsory supplementary file(s) |
the Authorship, disclosure statements, copyright, and license agreement form, Ethical Clearance/Waiver Documentation and any other relevant form applicable to your submission |
|
Ethical clearance/waiver documentation/collection permits |
in cases where samples of biological materials or specimens are collected or processed, reference to the relevant permits to do so as issued by the relevant authorities must be included in the Methods section and copies of the relevant documents must accompany the manuscript submission
in cases where date are collected from human beings, evidence of ethical clearance for the study, such as the study approval letter or certificate from the Institutional Review Board (IRB), a waiver from the IRB et cetera |
Review Articles
A review article should inform a broad readership about fields with significant recent advances of immense, fundamental importance and highlight unresolved questions and future directions.
|
Submission status |
open |
|
Word limit |
7000 words (excluding the abstract, tables, figures, graphs, and references) |
|
Abstract |
maximum: 250 words |
|
Main text |
structural headings are not always appropriate, but guidance is provided in the full structure |
|
References |
60 or less, adhere to the Harvard referencing style |
|
Tables, figures and graphs |
4 or less, adhere to the Illustrations requirements found in the AOSIS House style guide |
|
Formatting requirements |
apply the guidelines located on the Formatting requirements page and the AOSIS house style guide |
|
Compulsory supplementary file(s) |
the Authorship, disclosure statements, copyright, and license agreement form, Ethical Clearance/Waiver Documentation and any other relevant form applicable to your submission |
|
Ethical clearance/waiver documentation |
evidence of ethical clearance must be provided if the research involves primary data collected from human subjects; research based on document analysis (historical records, policy documents, etc.), or that uses publicly available anonymised data (like labour force surveys, or census data) does not require ethical clearance. |
Nomenclature Changes
Brief notes on nomenclatural changes where these do not include new or revised taxon descriptions will be consolidated and published as a single short communication and referenced with all authors listed alphabetically, but each contributing author will be credited in the text with their specific section. Nomenclatural changes that form part of a larger taxonomic study that includes new findings or interpretations could be published as either a full research article or as a short communication.
|
Submission status |
open |
|
Word limit |
1400-2500 words (excluding the abstract, tables, figures, graphs, and references) |
|
Abstract |
maximum: 250 words |
|
Main text |
structural headings are not required, but authors are encouraged to use them to help guide readers when necessary |
|
References |
20 or less, adhere to the Harvard referencing style |
|
Tables, figures and graphs |
2 or less, adhere to the Illustrations requirements found in the AOSIS House style guide |
|
Formatting requirements |
apply the guidelines located on the Formatting requirements page and the AOSIS house style guide |
|
Compulsory supplementary file(s) |
the Authorship, disclosure statements, copyright, and license agreement form, and any other relevant form applicable to your submission |
New Distribution Records
New distribution records that significantly amplify the known range of a species or records of rare species for which only limited information is available, will be considered.
|
Submission status |
open |
|
Word limit |
1600 words (excluding the abstract, tables, figures, graphs, and references) |
|
Abstract |
maximum: 250 words |
|
Main text |
structural headings are not required, but authors are encouraged to use them to help guide readers when necessary |
|
References |
20 or less, adhere to the Harvard referencing style |
|
Tables, figures and graphs |
5 or less, adhere to the Illustrations requirements found in the AOSIS House style guide |
|
Formatting requirements |
apply the guidelines located on the Formatting requirements page and the AOSIS house style guide
|
|
Compulsory supplementary file(s) |
the Authorship, disclosure statements, copyright, and license agreement form, and any other relevant form applicable to your submission |
Checklists
Either national or regional checklist includes taxonomic information such as author citation, synonyms, and type information. Checklists for local scale areas may be considered if these include analyses and interpretation of the diversity. In cases where the checklists include more than 20 taxa, it may be necessary to only publish the full list in the online version of the journal as an appendix.
|
Submission status |
open |
|
Word limit |
1000 words (excluding the abstract, tables, figures, graphs, and references) |
|
Abstract |
maximum: 250 words |
|
Main text |
structural headings are not required, but authors are encouraged to use them to help guide readers when necessary |
|
References |
10 or less, adhere to the Harvard referencing style |
|
Tables, figures and graphs |
1 or less, adhere to the Illustrations requirements found in the AOSIS House style guide |
|
Formatting requirements |
apply the guidelines located on the Formatting requirements page and the AOSIS house style guide |
|
Compulsory supplementary file(s) |
the Authorship, disclosure statements, copyright, and license agreement form, and any other relevant form applicable to your submission |
Short Communications
Short Communications is short articles addressing new ideas and controversial opinions. It should be a high-quality, hypothesis-driven, self-contained piece of original research and/or the proposal of a new theory or concept based on existing research.
|
Submission status |
open |
|
Word limit |
2000 words (excluding the abstract, tables, figures, graphs, and references) |
|
Abstract |
maximum: 250 words |
|
Main text |
requires structural headings, refer to the full structure
|
|
References |
30 or less, adhere to the Harvard referencing style |
|
Tables, figures and graphs |
6 or less, adhere to the Illustrations requirements found in the AOSIS House style guide |
|
Formatting requirements |
apply the guidelines located on the Formatting requirements page and the AOSIS house style guide |
|
Compulsory supplementary file(s) |
the Authorship, disclosure statements, copyright, and license agreement form, Ethical Clearance/Waiver Documentation, Collection Permits and any other relevant form applicable to your submission |
|
Ethical clearance/waiver documentation |
evidence of ethical clearance for the study, such as the study approval letter or certificate from the Institutional Review Board (IRB), a waiver from the IRB et cetera |
|
Collection Permits |
in cases where samples of biological materials or specimens are collected or processed, reference to the relevant permits to do so as issued by the relevant authorities must be included in the Methods section and copies of the relevant documents must accompany the manuscript submission |
Corrections
A correction provides the platform to communicate important, scientifically relevant errors or missing information in a published article. Any changes after publication that affect the scientific interpretation (e.g., changes to a misleading portion of an otherwise reliable publication, an error in a figure, error in data that does not affect conclusions or addition of missing details about a method) are announced using a Correction. Read our submission procedure for corrections and publishing policies.
|
Compulsory title |
The title of the submission should have the following format: ‘Corrigendum: Title of the original article’. |
|
Submission File |
completed Correction Submission Form (required) |
Cover Letter
The authorship, disclosure statements, copyright, and license agreement form is our compulsory cover letter which needs to form part of your submission. Kindly download and complete, in English, the provided form.
Anyone that has made a significant contribution to the research and the paper must be listed as an author in your cover letter. Contributions that fall short of meeting the criteria as stipulated in our policy should rather be mentioned in the ‘Acknowledgements’ section of the manuscript. Read our authorship guidelines and author contribution statement policies.
Original Research Article full structure
Title: The article’s full title should contain a maximum of 95 characters (including spaces).
Abstract: The abstract, written in English, should be no longer than 250 words and must be written in the past tense. The abstract should give a succinct account of the objectives, methods, results and significance of the matter. The structured abstract for an Original Research article should consist of seven paragraphs labelled Background, Aim, Setting, Methods, Results, Conclusion and Contribution.
- Background: Summarise the social value (importance, relevance) and scientific value (knowledge gap) that your study addresses.
- Aim: State the overall aim of the study.
- Setting: State the setting for the study.
- Methods: Clearly express the basic design of the study, and name or briefly describe the methods used without going into excessive detail.
- Results: State the main findings.
- Conclusion: State your conclusion and any key implications or recommendations.
- Contribution: What key insights into the research results and its future function are revealed? How do these insights link to the focus and scope of the journal? It should be a concise statement of the primary contribution of the manuscript; and how it fits within the scope of the journal.
Do not cite references and do not use abbreviations excessively in the abstract.
Introduction: The introduction must contain your argument for the social and scientific value of the study, as well as the aim and objectives:
- Social value: The first part of the introduction should make a clear and logical argument for the importance or relevance of the study. Your argument should be supported by the use of evidence from the literature.
- Scientific value: The second part of the introduction should make a clear and logical argument for the originality of the study. This should include a summary of what is already known about the research question or specific topic and should clarify the knowledge gap that this study will address. Your argument should be supported by the use of evidence from the literature.
- Conceptual framework: In some research articles it will also be important to describe the underlying theoretical basis for the research and how these theories are linked together in a conceptual framework. The theoretical evidence used to construct the conceptual framework should be referenced from the literature.
- Aim and objectives: The introduction should conclude with a clear summary of the aim and objectives of this study.
Research methods and design: The methods section should be structured according to the following sub-headings:
- Study design: An outline of the type of study design.
- Setting: A description of the setting for the study; for example, the type of community from which the participants came or the nature of the health system and services in which the study is conducted.
- Study population and sampling strategy: Describe the study population and any inclusion or exclusion criteria. Describe the intended sample size and your sample size calculation or justification. Describe the sampling strategy used. Describe in practical terms how this was implemented.
- Intervention (if appropriate): If there were intervention and comparison groups, describe the intervention in detail and what happened to the comparison groups.
- Data collection: Define the data collection tools that were used and their validity. Describe in practical terms how data were collected and any key issues involved, e.g. language barriers.
- Data analysis: Describe how data were captured, checked and cleaned. Describe the analysis process, for example, the statistical tests used or steps followed in qualitative data analysis.
- Ethical considerations: Approval must have been obtained for all studies from the author's institution or other relevant ethics committee and the institution’s name and permit numbers should be stated here.
Results: Present the results of your study in a logical sequence that addresses the aim and objectives of your study. Use tables and figures as required to present your findings. Use quotations as required to establish your interpretation of qualitative data. All units should conform to the SI convention and be abbreviated accordingly. Metric units and their international symbols are used throughout, as is the decimal point (not the decimal comma).
Discussion: The discussion section should address the following four elements:
- Key findings: Summarise the key findings without reiterating details of the results.
- Discussion of key findings: Explain how the key findings relate to previous research or to existing knowledge, practice or policy.
- Strengths and limitations: Describe the strengths and limitations of your methods and what the reader should take into account when interpreting your results.
- Implications or recommendations: State the implications of your study or recommendations for future research (questions that remain unanswered), policy or practice. Make sure that the recommendations flow directly from your findings.
Conclusion: Provide a brief conclusion that summarises the results and their meaning or significance in relation to each objective of the study.
Acknowledgements: Those who contributed to the work but do not meet our authorship criteria should be listed in the Acknowledgments with a description of the contribution. Authors are responsible for ensuring that anyone named in the Acknowledgments agrees to be named. Refer to the acknowledgement structure guide on our Formatting Requirements page.
Also provide the following, each under their own heading:
- Competing interests: This section should list specific competing interests associated with any of the authors. If authors declare that no competing interests exist, the article will include a statement to this effect: The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationship(s) that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article. Read our policy on competing interests.
- Author contributions: All authors must meet the criteria for authorship as outlined in the authorship policy and author contribution statement policies.
- Funding: Provide information on funding if relevant
- Data availability: All research articles are encouraged to have a data availability statement.
- Disclaimer: A statement that the views expressed in the submitted article are his or her own and not an official position of the institution or funder.
References: Authors should provide direct references to original research sources whenever possible. References should not be used by authors, editors, or peer reviewers to promote self-interests. Refer to the journal referencing style downloadable on our Formatting Requirements page.
Review Article full structure
Title: The article’s full title should contain a maximum of 95 characters (including spaces).
Abstract: The abstract should be no longer than 250 words and must be written in the past tense. The abstract should give a concise account of the objectives, methods, results and significance of the matter. The abstract can be structured and should consist of six paragraphs labelled Background, Aim, Method, Results, Conclusion and Contribution.
- Background: Why is the topic important to us? State the context of the review
- Aim: What is the purpose of your review? Describe the aim or purpose of your review.
- Method: How did you go about performing the review? Describe the methods used for searching, selecting and appraising your evidence.
- Results: What are the findings? What are the main findings of your literature review?
- Conclusion: What are the implications of your answer? Briefly summarise any potential implications.
- Contribution: What key insights into the research results and its future function are revealed? How do these insights link to the focus and scope of the journal? It should be a concise statement of the primary contribution of the manuscript; and how it fits within the scope of the journal.
Introduction: Present an argument for the social and scientific value of your review that is itself supported by the literature. Present the aim and objectives of your literature review.
Methods: Although this is not a systematic review (see instructions on original research for this type of article) it is still necessary to outline how you searched for, selected and appraised the literature that you used. Discuss any methodological limitations.
Review findings: Present your review of the literature and make use of appropriate sub-headings. Your review should be a critical synthesis of the literature.
Implications and recommendations: Discuss the findings of your review in terms of the implications for policy makers and clinicians or recommendations for future research.
Conclusion: This should clearly state the main conclusions of the review in terms of addressing the original aim and objectives.
Acknowledgements: Those who contributed to the work but do not meet our authorship criteria should be listed in the Acknowledgments with a description of the contribution. Authors are responsible for ensuring that anyone named in the Acknowledgments agrees to be named. Refer to the acknowledgement structure guide on our Formatting Requirements page.
Also provide the following, each under their own heading:
- Competing interests: This section should list specific competing interests associated with any of the authors. If authors declare that no competing interests exist, the article will include a statement to this effect: The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationship(s) that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article. Read our policy on competing interests.
- Author contributions: All authors must meet the criteria for authorship as outlined in the authorship policy and author contribution statement policies.
- Funding: Provide information on funding if relevant
- Data availability: All research articles are encouraged to have a data availability statement.
- Disclaimer: a statement that the views expressed in the submitted article are his or her own and not an official position of the institution or funder.
References: Authors should provide direct references to original research sources whenever possible. References should not be used by authors, editors, or peer reviewers to promote self-interests. Refer to the journal referencing style downloadable on our Formatting Requirements page.
INPAGE MENU
Ethical considerations structure Acknowledgements structure
Style and format
File format
- Manuscript files can be in the following formats: DOC, DOCX, or RTF. Microsoft Word documents should not be locked or protected.
- LaTeX documents (.tex) should be converted into Microsoft Word (.doc) before submission online.
- Rich Text Format (RTF): Users of other word processing packages should save or convert their files to RTF before uploading. Many free tools are available that will make this process easier.
Length
Manuscripts should adhere to the author guidelines of the journal. There are restrictions on word count, number of figures, or amount of supporting information.
Font
Use a standard font size and any standard font family.
Special characters
Do not use the font named ‘Symbol’. To add symbols to the manuscript, use the Insert → Symbol function in your word processor or paste in the appropriate Unicode character. Refer to our AOSIS house style guide on mathematical and Unicode font guidelines.
Headings
Ensure that formatting for headings is consistent in the manuscript. Limit manuscript sections and sub-sections to four heading levels. To avoid confusion during the review and production process, ensure that the different heading levels used in your work are visually distinct from one another. The simplest way to achieve this is to use different font sizes and/or a combination of bold/italics for different heading levels.
Keywords
Identify eight keywords that represent the content of your manuscript and are specific to your field or sub-field, ensure to separate each keyword with a semi-colon. Test your keywords: when you enter your keywords into the various journal and academic databases like Google Scholar, do the results include papers similar to your topic? If not, revise the terms until they do.
Layout and spacing
Manuscript text should have a 1.5 line spacing.
Page and line numbers
Include page numbers and line numbers in the manuscript file. Use continuous line numbers (do not restart the numbering on each page).
Footnotes
Footnotes are not ideal. If your manuscript contains footnotes, move the information into the main text or the reference list, depending on the content.
Language
Manuscripts must be written in British English, according to the Oxford English Dictionary (avoid Americanisms [e.g. use ‘s’ and not ‘z’ spellings], and set your version of Microsoft Word default language to UK English). Refer to the AOSIS house style guide for more information.
Abbreviations
Define abbreviations upon first appearance in the text. Do not use non-standard abbreviations unless they appear at least three times in the text. Keep abbreviations to a minimum.
Illustrations
Illustrations fall into two categories:
- Figures: Photographs, drawings, diagrams, graphs, flowcharts, maps, etc.
- Tables and/or Boxes: Text and/or numbers arranged in orderly columns and rows.
Every time a Figure, Table and/or Box is presented in your manuscript, it should be referred to three times:
- In a legend, which includes a number, a title, and its source. The legend is placed below a Figure and above a Table and/or Box. The source section should consist of the in-text citation, creator or owner and its year of creation, and any other attribution required as stipulated by the permission received (person and place) to reproduce.
- In the body of your written manuscript. You should include an in-text citation and a sentence or two about the image explaining what it illustrates and why it is there.
- As a reference entry within your reference list.
AOSIS house style
The manuscript must adhere to the AOSIS house style guide.
References
Referencing style guide
The manuscript must adhere to the Harvard referencing style.
Permission to use copyright material
The following information will assist you in understanding your responsibilities and in requesting permission to reproduce copyrighted material in your work. All permissions granted must be submitted to the journal together with your manuscript, and you must ensure that a clearly written source accompanies the work.
Your responsibilities
As the author, you are responsible for obtaining permission and paying any fees to use the third-party copyrighted material that your manuscript contains.
Material that will need clearance
Content not in the public domain or freely available to use under a license such as a creative commons license will require clearance. It includes the use of photographs, figures, maps, tables, cartoons, advertisements, epigraphs and quotations that are over the limits referred to under ‘Modification/adaptation of figures and tables’.
Web material
Image or text material on the Web may not be the intellectual property of the site hosting it. You must always identify the original copyright source and obtain explicit permission. Take particular care with photographs obtained from websites, blogs, Google image searches, YouTube, Wikimedia, etc.
Material previously published by you or your colleague
Check the contract with the other publisher to see whether, and under what conditions, the material can be reused in this AOSIS publication. If in any doubt, permission must be obtained.
Images of, or information about, identifiable individuals
It is your responsibility to obtain consent from patients and other individuals for the use of information, images, audio files, and video clips from which they may be identified. Bear in mind the following points:
- Masking a person’s eyes is not an adequate or acceptable means of rendering an image anonymous.
- People may still be recognizable to individuals or their families, even if head/shoulders are not included.
- People may recognize themselves from clinical descriptions or case reports.
Modification/adaptation of figures and tables
Use the original figure as first published where appropriate. However:
- No clearance is required if you create figures or tables using factual data from copyrighted material.
- No clearance is required if, after you have created a single figure or table using data from two or more figures or tables, no single source comprises more than 75% of the new figure or table.
- No clearance is required if, after you have created a new figure or table by adding your own data to an existing figure or table, your data comprises more than 25% of the new figure or table.
- Clearance is required if you create a figure or table using parts from two or more third-party sources, and each part contains more than 75% of the content of the original figure/table part.
Quotations
For prose, permission is required for single quotations of over 400 words or multiple quotations from the same source that cumulatively total more than 800 words. But note that, even if below these limits, permissions must be cleared for quotations that represent the ‘heart of the work’ or a substantial portion of the overall original source material.
Clear before you submit your final manuscript
Permissions must be cleared before the final version of your manuscript is submitted for publication. If permission cannot be obtained, you should find an alternative or remove the material. Provide electronic copies of all consent forms obtained when you submit your final manuscript, numbered and named accordingly.
Ethical considerations
This section should include the statements of compliance with standards of research involving either animal or human involvement. If your study involves human subjects and/or animals, and if your manuscript includes case reports/case series, you need to provide the following:
- Authors must provide the name of the ethical approval committee/Institutional Review Board they have obtained consent from and approval number/ID.
- Authors should specifically mention if a waiver was obtained for the study and the reason for the waiver. They should confirm that the study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2013.
- Authors must state that written informed consent was obtained from the participants of the study (and the relevant document(s) must be provided when requested by the journal). If verbal informed consent was obtained, the reason(s) for the absence of written consent must be provided.
- For case reports/case series involving minor subjects/children/infants, authors should confirm that the statements of written informed consent from legally authorised representatives/parents/guardians are available; if verbal informed consent was obtained, reasons for this must be mentioned.
- Since patients have a right to privacy, identifying information (including patients’ images, names, initials, or hospital numbers) should not be included in recordings, written descriptions, or photographs unless the information is essential for scientific purposes. In any case, written informed consent from the patient must be obtained for publication of these graphics in print and electronic form. If such consent has not been obtained, personal details of patients in any part of the paper and in any supplementary materials (including illustrations) must be removed before submission.
|
Subject |
Scenario |
Suggested statement of compliance |
|
Animals: Include the statement of compliance with standards of research involving animals. |
If your work includes animals, it is necessary to have a statement of compliance with research standards involving animals.
|
All procedures performed in studies involving animals followed all international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals. |
|
If you publish an article and there are reasons to believe that you could have used animals but did not.
|
This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors. |
|
|
Humans: Include the statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans. |
If your work does not include humans as subjects, you may finish the ethical statement to include.
|
This article does not contain any studies involving human participants performed by any of the authors. |
|
If your work involves humans as a subject, you had to receive ethics approval.
|
An application for full ethical approval was made to the [committee/Institutional Review Board] and ethics consent was received on [date]. The ethics approval number is [full ethics approval number]. |
|
|
If your work involves humans as a subject, but you received an ethics waiver.
|
An application for full ethical approval was made to the [committee/Institutional Review Board] and ethics consent was received on [date]. The ethics waiver number is [full number]. The [committee/Institutional Review Board] issued an ethics waiver for the study because [reason for the ethics waiver]. |
|
|
Additional statements: If your work involves humans, it is necessary to include one of the above and the following two additional statements. |
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.a
Informed Consent: [Written/Verbal] informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study. [If verbal informed consent was obtained, the reason(s) for the absence of written consent must be provided.] |
|
|
Plant material and/or organisms: Include the statement of compliance with standards of research involving genetically modified, endangered or protected organisms and/or plants. |
If your work involves genetically modified, endangered, or protected organisms, plant material, or requires bioprospecting, biodiversity, or conservation-related permits, you must include a statement confirming compliance with the relevant research standards.
|
All ethical considerations, institutional and international standards for research integrity, have been strictly followed in this study. The research adheres to all relevant ethical guidelines applicable to plant research. No activities involving genetically modified, endangered or protected organisms requiring special ethical approval were conducted. Any potential environmental or conservation concerns were carefully assessed and managed in accordance with established international best practices. |
a, Do keep in mind: The necessary and sufficient condition is to conduct research in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. If your institution has no department that deals with ethics, then you should not mention institutional standards. If your country has no committee that deals with ethics, then you should not mention national standards.
Acknowledgements structure
Acknowledgements
The Acknowledgements section follows the Conclusions section and serves to clearly and appropriately disclose the following:
- Prior dissemination: Indicate if the work or portions of it have previously appeared in a thesis, preprint, or conference presentation.
- Non-author contributors: Recognise any individuals whose contributions (e.g., intellectual input, technical assistance, writing or editing support, provision of special equipment or materials) do not meet the criteria for authorship. Refer to AOSIS Publishing policies on authorship.
- Use of AI-assisted technologies: Disclose any use of generative AI or AI-assisted technologies (e.g., for data analysis, dataset or artefact creation) in conducting the research. Authors must take full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of all content. AI tools must not be credited as authors, and their role—if any—should be clearly described in a declaration. Refer to AOSIS Publishing policies on AI-assisted technology.
- Author declarations: Include required statements on funding, competing interests, data availability, ethical approval, and any applicable disclaimers.
These transparency statements support ethical publishing practices and should be presented concisely and accurately.
Disclosures
Authors are required to disclose any prior dissemination of the manuscript content. This includes, but is not limited to:
- Thesis-based work (e.g., master's or doctoral theses).
- Preprint versions that are published on open repositories. Refer to our Frequently Asked Questions: Questions from Authors - Preprints.
- Conference papers or presentations that were expanded into an article.
Additionally, authors should disclose contributors who supported the work but do not meet authorship criteria, ensuring that permission has been obtained to acknowledge them.
Disclosure of thesis-based content
If a multi-authored publication draws substantially from a student's dissertation or thesis, the student should preferably be listed as the principal author. Similarly, the student's supervisor should be included as a co-author.
If the supervisor explicitly declines any of the responsibilities associated with co-authorship, their contribution must be detailed in the 'Acknowledgements' section, and they must be informed to prevent any misunderstandings.
AOSIS will require a written confirmation or an email from the supervisors acknowledging their awareness of the publication and confirming they have no objection to not being listed as co-authors. If obtaining such confirmation is not feasible, the author should provide an explanation (e.g., inability to make contact, refusal, conflict, or other reasons). Kindly refer to AOSIS Publishing policies.
Authors are required to consult the Frequently Asked Questions on publishing articles based on thesis or dissertation research to ensure compliance with ethical publishing practices and to avoid concerns related to data slicing.
|
Scenario |
Suggested thesis-based disclosures |
|
Example 1 – no overlap with published thesis |
This article is based on research originally conducted as part of [Authors' full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] [master’s/doctoral] thesis titled ‘[Thesis Title]’, submitted to the [Faculty/Department], [University Name] in [Year]. The thesis was supervised by [Supervisor(s) Full Name(s), no salutations needed]. The thesis was reworked, revised, and adapted into a journal article for publication. The original thesis is available at: [Thesis URL]. |
|
Example 2 – some overlap with published thesis |
This article includes content that overlaps with research originally conducted as part of [Authors' full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname]’s [master’s/doctoral] thesis titled ‘[Thesis Title]’, submitted to the [Faculty/Department], [University Name] in [Year]. The thesis was supervised by [Supervisor Full Name(s), no salutations needed]. Portions of the data, analysis, and discussion have been revised, updated, and adapted for publication as a journal article. The original thesis is publicly available at: [Thesis URL]. The author affirms that this article complies with ethical standards for secondary publication, and appropriate acknowledgement has been made of the original work. |
|
Example 3 – unpublished thesis |
This article is based on research originally conducted as part of [Authors' full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname]’s [master’s/doctoral] thesis titled ‘[Thesis Title]’, submitted to the [Faculty/Department], [University Name] in [Year]. The thesis is currently unpublished and not publicly available. The thesis was supervised by [Supervisor(s) Full Name(s), no salutations needed]. The thesis was reworked, revised and adapted into a journal article for publication. The author confirms that the content has not been previously published or disseminated and complies with ethical standards for original publication. |
|
Example 4 – no public link available |
This article is based on research originally conducted as part of [Authors' full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname]’s [master’s/doctoral] thesis titled ‘[Thesis Title]’, submitted to the [Faculty/Department], [University Name] in [Year]. The thesis was supervised by [Supervisor Full Name(s), no salutations needed]. The thesis was reworked, revised, and adapted into a journal article for publication. The original thesis is currently unpublished and was not publicly available online at the time of publishing this article. |
|
Example 5 – supervisors not included as authors |
This article is based on research originally conducted as part of [Authors' full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname]’s [master’s/doctoral] thesis titled ‘[Thesis Title]’, submitted to the [Faculty/Department], [University Name] in [Year]. The thesis was supervised by [Supervisor(s) Full Name(s), no salutations needed]. The supervisors were not involved in the preparation of this article and were not listed as co-authors. Portions of the thesis have been revised, updated, and adapted for publication as a journal article. The original thesis is publicly available at: [Thesis URL]. |
|
Example 6 – partial fulfilment for a degree |
The research presented in this article formed part of [Authors' full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname]'s postgraduate studies and was originally conducted as part of their [Master’s/Doctoral] thesis titled ‘[Thesis Title]’, submitted to the [Faculty/Department], [University Name] in [Year], under the supervision of [Supervisor(s) Full Name(s)]. The thesis was submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the [Master’s/PhD] degree. Portions of the thesis have been revised, updated, and adapted for publication as a journal article. The original thesis is publicly available at: [Thesis URL]. |
Disclosure of preprint-based content
|
Scenario |
Suggested preprint-based disclosures |
|
Example 1 |
A preprint version of this work was previously published on [Preprint Server Name] ([DOI or link]), and we acknowledge its role in shaping the final article. |
|
Example 2 – preprint feedback incorporated in the final manuscript |
We acknowledge the initial version of this work published as a preprint on [Preprint Server Name] ([DOI or link]). Feedback received during the preprint phase was thoroughly considered and incorporated into the article prior to its acceptance for publication. |
|
Example 3 |
A preprint version of this work was previously published on [Preprint Server Name] ([In-text citation])*.
*[Kindly, include a full reference to the preprint in the reference list.] |
Disclosure of conference-based content
|
Scenario |
Suggested conference-based disclosures |
|
Example 1 – based on a conference paper |
This article is based on a conference paper originally presented at [Conference Name], held in [Location], on [Date(s)]. The conference paper, titled '[Original Paper Title],' was subsequently expanded and revised for this journal publication. This republication is done with permission from the conference organisers. |
|
Example 2 – based on a conference abstract |
This article is based on research previously presented in abstract form at [Conference Name], held in [Location] on [Date(s)]. The abstract has since been developed into a full article, which has been expanded and revised for journal publication. This republication is done with permission from the conference organisers. |
|
Example 3 – based on a conference poster |
This article is based on research originally presented as a poster at [Conference Name], held in [Location] on [Date(s)]. The content has since been expanded and revised for journal publication. This republication is done with permission from the conference organisers. |
Disclosure of contributors not qualifying for authorship
The acknowledgement section includes listing those who contributed to the work but did not meet authorship criteria, with the corresponding description of the contribution. Acknowledge anyone who provided intellectual assistance, technical help (incl. editing), or special equipment and/or materials. Authors are responsible for ensuring that anyone named in the Acknowledgements agrees to be named.
|
Scenario |
Suggested disclosures |
|
Example 1 |
The [author or authors] would like to thank [Full Name], [Affiliation or Role, if applicable], for [brief description of contribution, e.g., their valuable assistance with data collection / technical support / insightful feedback during the early stages of this project]. While their contribution was important, it did not meet the criteria for authorship. |
|
Example 2 – an acknowledgement of supervisors when not included as authors |
The [author or authors] would like to thank [Supervisor(s) Full Name(s)] for their guidance and supervision during the original research conducted as part of the [master's/doctoral] thesis, which served as the basis for this article. The authors acknowledge that [these supervisors/the supervisor] are not listed as [a co-author/co-authors] of this article and confirm that the supervisor(s) had no objection to this arrangement. |
Disclosure of AI-assisted technologies
The Acknowledgements section must include a clear statement disclosing any use of generative AI or AI-assisted technologies (e.g., for data analysis, dataset or artefact creation) in conducting the research. This statement should:
- Be specific by naming the exact AI tool(s) used.
- State the purpose of the tool’s use, such as artefact creation or data analysis.
- Disclose human oversight by confirming that authors have reviewed, edited, and take full responsibility for the final content.
Authors remain fully responsible for the integrity and accuracy of all material submitted. AI tools must not be credited as authors, as they do not meet authorship criteria. Their role, if applicable, should be clearly and transparently described.
|
Scenario |
Suggested AI disclosures |
|
Example 1 - general use |
During the preparation of this work, the [author or authors] used [tool name, version] to [state the purpose of the tool’s use]. The content was reviewed and edited by the authors, who take full responsibility for its accuracy. |
|
Example 2 – artefact creation |
This article includes visual content (e.g., [figures/diagrams/images]) generated with the assistance of [tool name, version]. The authors reviewed, modified, and validated all AI-generated artefacts and take full responsibility for their accuracy and integrity. |
|
Example 3 – data analysis or code assistance |
Portions of the data analysis were generated with assistance from [tool name, version]. The final code and interpretations were developed and validated by the [author or authors]. The content was reviewed and edited by the [author or authors], who take full responsibility for its accuracy. |
|
Example 4 – drafting and idea generation |
[Tool name, version] was used to brainstorm structure and phrasing during the early drafting of this manuscript. All intellectual contributions and final content are the result of the authors’ work. The content was reviewed and edited by the authors, who take full responsibility for its accuracy. |
Declarations
Authors must provide clear and complete disclosures related to competing interests, detailed author contributions, funding sources, data availability, and any necessary disclaimers. These statements help maintain transparency, uphold ethical standards, and ensure the integrity of the publication process. Author declarations to include, each under its subheading, are:
- Competing interests
- Author contributions
- Funding information
- Data availability statement
- Disclaimer
Competing interests
This section should list specific competing interests associated with any of the authors. If authors declare that no competing interests exist, the article will include a statement under Example 1. Read our policy on competing interests.
The following are examples of competing interest statements. If you use one of the examples, you should modify it to fit your specific relationship.
|
Scenario |
Suggested competing interest statements |
|
Example 1 |
The [author or authors], [Authors' full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname], declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article. |
|
Example 2 |
[Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] has reported [that they have a financial and/or business interest in, OR are a consultant to, OR received funding from] a company that may be affected by the research reported in the enclosed publication. They have disclosed those interests fully and have in place an approved plan for managing any potential conflicts arising from that involvement. |
|
Example 3 |
[Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] developed the theoretical formalism, performed the analytic calculations and performed the numerical simulations. Both [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] contributed to the final version of the article. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] supervised the project. |
|
Example 4 |
[Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] conceived and planned the experiments. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] carried out the experiments. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] planned and carried out the simulations. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] contributed to sample preparation. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] contributed to the interpretation of the results. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] took the lead in writing the article. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis and article. |
|
Example 5 |
[Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] designed the model and the computational framework and analysed the data. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] carried out the implementation. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] performed the calculations. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] wrote the article with input from all authors. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] conceived the study and were in charge of overall direction and planning. |
|
Example 6 |
[Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] designed and performed the experiments, derived the models and analysed the data. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] assisted with [specify] measurements, and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] helped carry out the [specify] simulations. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] wrote the article in consultation with [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname]. |
|
Example 7 |
[Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] devised the project, the main conceptual ideas and a proof outline. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] worked out almost all of the technical details and performed the numerical calculations for the suggested experiment. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] worked out the bounds for quantum mechanics, with help from [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname]. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] verified the numerical results of the [specify] by an independent implementation. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] proposed the [specify] experiment in discussions with [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname]. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] wrote the article. |
|
Example 8 |
[Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] designed the study. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] performed the [specify] experiments. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] performed [specify] simulations. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] expressed and purified all proteins. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] analysed the data. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] wrote the paper with input from all authors. |
|
Example 9 |
[Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] designed and directed the project; [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] performed the experiments. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] analysed spectra. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] made the simulations. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] developed the theoretical framework. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] and [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] wrote the article. |
|
Example 10 - Funding |
The [author or authors], [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname], of this publication received research funding from [entity], which is developing products related to the research described in this publication. In addition, the [author or authors] serve as consultants to [entity] and receive compensation for these services. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the [university name/institution name] in accordance with its policy on objectivity in research. |
|
Example 11 - Support
|
The [author or authors], [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname], of this publication receive research support from [name of research sponsor] with an equipment loan from [entity]. The [author/authors] also [have an equity interest in, serve as a consultant to, serve on an advisory board or board of directors for] [entity]. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the [university name/institution name] in accordance with its policy on objectivity in research. |
|
Example 12 - Editorial Board Member for this journal (before peer review) |
The [author or authors], [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname], serve as an editorial board [member or members] of this journal. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname] has no other competing interests to declare. |
|
Example 13 - Editorial Board Member for this journal (after peer review) |
The author(s) declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article. The [author or authors], [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname], serve as an editorial board [member to members] of this journal. The peer review process for this submission was handled independently, and the [author or authors] had no involvement in the editorial decision-making process for this article. The [author or authors] have no other competing interests to declare. |
|
Example 14 - Membership in a political or ideological movement |
The [author or authors], [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname], declare(s) that they are an official member of [Name of Movement/Organisation]. They have disclosed this affiliation fully and confirm that it has not influenced the design, conduct, or reporting of the research presented in this article. |
CRediT authorship contribution
As part of our commitment to transparency and recognition of individual contributions, we adopted the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) system. CRediT enables authors to clearly and accurately describe each contributor’s specific role in the production and publication of research output, such as research articles. The submitting author should select the appropriate contribution categories for each individual on our Authorship, Disclosure Statements, Copyright, and License Agreement Form (Cover Letter), noting that multiple roles may apply where relevant.
|
CRediT’s 14 Contributor Roles |
Contributor Roles Defined |
|
Conceptualisation |
Ideas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims. |
|
Data curation |
Management activities to annotate (produce metadata), scrub data and maintain research data (including software code, where it is necessary for interpreting the data itself) for initial use and later re-use. |
|
Formal analysis |
Application of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyse or synthesise study data. |
|
Funding acquisition |
Acquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication. |
|
Investigation |
Conducting a research and investigation process, specifically performing the experiments, or data/evidence collection. |
|
Methodology |
Development or design of methodology; creation of models. |
|
Project administration |
Management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution. |
|
Resources |
Provision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, computing resources, or other analysis tools. |
|
Software |
Programming, software development; designing computer programs; implementation of the computer code and supporting algorithms; testing of existing code components. |
|
Supervision |
Oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team. |
|
Validation |
Verification, whether as a part of the activity or separate, of the overall replication/reproducibility of results/experiments and other research outputs. |
|
Visualisation |
Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically visualisation/data presentation. |
|
Writing - original draft |
Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft (including substantive translation). |
|
Writing - review & editing |
Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work by those from the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary or revision – including pre- or post-publication stages. |
As we transition to the CRediT authorship taxonomy system, we will move away from the previous descriptive Author Contribution Statements that relied on author abbreviations and lengthy explanations. Instead, authors will be listed in the same order as they appear in the authorship list, with their specific contribution roles clearly indicated under the CRediT Authorship Contribution.
|
Scenario |
Suggested CRediT formulations |
|
Example 1 - Multi-Authored Manuscript |
[Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname]: [CRediT authorship taxonomy roles]. [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname]: [CRediT authorship taxonomy roles]. All authors reviewed the article, contributed to the discussion of results, approved the final version for submission and publication, and take responsibility for the integrity of its findings. |
|
Example 2 - Single-Author Manuscript |
[Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname]: [CRediT authorship taxonomy roles]. The author confirms that this work is entirely their own, has reviewed the article, approved the final version for submission and publication, and takes full responsibility for the integrity of its findings. |
CRediT (Guidelines)
We will use the official CRediT taxonomy capitalisations for all contributor roles and include full author names exactly as they appear on the authorship list, maintaining the same order. The implementation of CRediT does not change the journal’s existing authorship criteria; rather, it complements them by providing greater transparency and clarity regarding each author’s specific contributions. The following guidelines outline how CRediT should be applied to both single-author and multi-author manuscripts:
- Applicability: The CRediT taxonomy applies to both multi-author and single-author manuscripts. Using CRediT, even as a single author, promotes transparency, clarifies specific contributions, and ensures consistency with international publishing standards. For single-authored manuscripts, capture the author’s contributions using CRediT roles just as for multi-author manuscripts, including only the roles relevant to your work; this clarifies the author’s expertise and provides transparency in case of any post-publication authorship questions.
- Selecting relevant roles: Not all CRediT roles apply to every author. Authors should select only the roles that accurately reflect their individual contributions. It should not be assumed that all roles apply.
- Shared contributions: Multi-authored works may include identical CRediT roles across different authors where applicable.
- Spelling standards: Use Oxford spelling for taxonomy terms, e.g. Conceptualization → Conceptualisation and Visualization → Visualisation. Do not alter the standard taxonomy format (for example, keep Writing – review & editing, not Writing – review and editing).
- Author order: List authors in the same sequence as they appear on the first page of the article (Author 1 first, followed by Author 2, etc.).
- Order of roles: When listing CRediT roles per author, follow the order presented on the NISO CRediT taxonomy website. For example, in the NISO taxonomy, Supervision precedes Writing – Original draft.
Funding information
All research articles should have a funding acknowledgement statement included in the manuscript in the form of a sentence under a separate heading entitled ‘Funding information’. The funding agency should be written out in full, followed by the grant number in square brackets.
The following are examples of a funding statement. If you use one of the examples, you should modify it to fit your specific relationship.
|
Scenario |
Suggested funding statements |
|
Example 1 |
The [author or authors] disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the [research, authorship, and/or publication of this article]. This work was supported by the [council] (grant number: [specify]). |
|
Example 2 |
This work was supported by the [entity/organisation/trust] (grant number: [specify]), the [fund/institution] (grant number: [specify]) and the [council] (grant number: [specify]). |
|
Example 3 |
The [author or authors] received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. |
Data availability statement
All research articles should have a data availability statement included in the manuscript in the form of a sentence under a separate heading entitled ‘Data availability statement’.
The following are examples of a data availability statement. If you use one of the examples, you should modify it to fit your specific relationship.
|
Availability of data |
Suggested data availability statements |
|
Example 1 - Data openly available in a public repository that issues datasets with DOIs |
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in [repository name e.g ‘figshare’] at http://doi.org/[doi], reference number [reference number]. |
|
Example 2 - Data openly available in a public repository that does not issue DOIs |
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in [repository name] at [URL], reference number [reference number]. |
|
Example 3 - Data derived from public domain resources |
The data that support the findings of this study are available in [repository name] at [URL/DOI], reference number [reference number]. These data were derived from the following resources available in the public domain: [list resources and URLs] |
|
Example 4 - Data available within the article or its supplementary materials |
The [author or authors] confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials. |
|
Example 5 - Data generated at a central, large-scale facility, available upon request |
Raw data were generated at [facility name]. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname], on reasonable request. |
|
Example 6 - Embargo on data due to commercial restrictions |
The data that support the findings will be available in [repository name] at [URL / DOI link] following a [x month] embargo from the date of publication to allow for the commercialisation of research findings. |
|
Example 7 - Data available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions |
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname]. The data are not publicly available due to [restrictions, e.g. their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants]. |
|
Example 8 - Data subject to third-party restrictions |
The data that support the findings of this study are available from [third party]. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for this study. Data are available [from the authors / at URL] with the permission of [third party]. |
|
Example 9 - Data available on request from the authors |
The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to [reasons of sensitivity, e.g. human data] and are available from the corresponding author, [Author's full first name, initials for any subsequent names, followed by full surname], upon reasonable request [include information on the data’s location, e.g. in a controlled access repository where relevant]. |
|
Example 10 - Data sharing not applicable – no new data generated |
Data sharing is not applicable to this article, as no new data were created or analysed in this study. |
Disclaimer
A statement that the views expressed in the submitted article are his or her own and not an official position of the institution or funder.
|
Scenario |
Suggested disclaimer statement |
|
Example 1 |
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the [author or authors] and are the product of professional research. They do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency, or that of the publisher. The [author or authors] are responsible for this article's results, findings, and content. |
Blinding your manuscript
Submission checklist
Before you begin the submission process, here are some checks to consider helping you prepare and to ensure you will include everything we will need to process a complete submission.
Before you consider this journal, it is essential to acknowledge that:
- AOSIS is an open-access publisher and Article Processing Fees do apply, please read our article processing charge policies and article processing charges associated with this journal.
- The author(s) retain copyright on work published by AOSIS unless specified otherwise. Please read the copyright and licensing
- Read our publication policies, privacy policy and terms of use.
Quick check for your submissions
Check 1: Are you able to cover the cost of publishing
You do not need to pay anything at the time of submission, but an Article Processing Charge (APC) will be applied if your manuscript is accepted for publication. Your institution or funder will usually cover this; however, you should ensure that arrangements have been made before submission. You can find details about the charges via the ‘Publication fees’ link that appears on every journal website.
Check 2: Tailor your article for this journal
Make sure your manuscript is the right fit for the journal by reviewing the focus and scope. Determine whether the journal has the best fit for the most relevant aspect of your article. Examine the types of articles considered for publication by this journal, and align your manuscript to these requirements.
Check 3: Checking copyright issues
Do not self-plagiarise by ensuring that your manuscript has no relationship to previous research you published. If an article relationship does exist with previously published research, verify whether you require copyright permission for extensive quotations or paraphrasing. It is your responsibility to have gotten written permission for the reproduction of any images/ figures/tables before submitting your manuscript. Please read our policy permission to use copyright material.
Check 4: Maintain clear, concise, and accessible writing
Confirm that the entire manuscript is organised and neatly prepared, spell-checked, and adhere to the formatting requirements stipulated in our submission guidelines:
- Have you stuck to the article length specified in the journal's instructions for authors?
- Have you included an abstract and keywords, highlighting your article's key points?
- Are all references made to the literature included in your references section?
- Are the references correctly formatted following the style of the journal?
- Is your article formatted to the style required by the journal?
Check 5: Anonymise your manuscript
The journal follows a double-blinded peer-review process, and you need to make your manuscript anonymous. This is to ensure that reviewers would not be able to identify you, your co-authors, or the institution where the research was carried out, ensuring that the review process is as objective as possible. Don’t know how to make your article anonymous, follow these instructions.
Check 6: Complete our cover page
The cover letter contains all the information we will need to process your submission upon acceptance, which includes the author account information. The cover letter must be completed in full. We require authors to have ORCID iDs, which can only be assigned by the ORCID Registry. Registering an ORCID profile is free of charge. Submit the complete cover page in Step 4 of the submission process.
Check 7: Your final manuscript files
Authors are requested to submit two versions of their manuscript:
- An anonymise (blinded) manuscript without any author names and affiliations in the text or on the title page (see Check 5 above). Self-identifying citations and references in the article text should either be avoided or left blank. Submit the unblinded manuscript in Step 2 of the submission process.
- The full version of your manuscript, with all elements disclosed. All elements and information need to reflect in the manuscript and nothing anonymised. Submit the full manuscript in Step 4 of the submission process.
Ready to submit your manuscript? Login to proceed with the 5-step submission process.